Armenia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Armenia
6.6%
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina
6.1%
in 2020
Armenia rank
46th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
49th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Armenia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 6.6% against 6.1% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 46th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.6% | 6.3% | 0.7% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 5.2% | 11.8% | 6.6% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 6.6% | 6.1% | 0.4% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Armenia or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Armenia, at 6.6% against 6.1% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0.5%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Armenia ranks 46th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 49th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.