Central African Republic vs Zambia: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
Central African Republic
13.1%
in 2020
Zambia
11.6%
in 2020
Central African Republic rank
21st
Zambia rank
24th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- Central African Republic
- Zambia
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 13.1% against 11.6% in Zambia, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 24th of 141 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.8% | 9.5% | 10.3% | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 13.1% | 11.6% | 1.4% | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, Central African Republic or Zambia?
- Central African Republic, at 13.1% against 11.6% in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between Central African Republic and Zambia?
- 1.5%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Zambia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Central African Republic and Zambia rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- Central African Republic ranks 21st and Zambia ranks 24th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.