China vs Netherlands: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
China
1.8%
in 2020
Netherlands
1.9%
in 2020
China rank
105th
Netherlands rank
104th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- China
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 1.9% against 1.8% in China, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.
China ranks 105th and Netherlands ranks 104th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.5% | 2.1% | 14.4% | China |
| 2010s | 1.4% | 2.6% | 1.2% | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 1.9% | 0.0% | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, China or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 1.9% against 1.8% in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between China and Netherlands?
- 0.1%, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Netherlands?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do China and Netherlands rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- China ranks 105th and Netherlands ranks 104th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.