China vs Uzbekistan: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans
China
1.8%
in 2020
Uzbekistan
2.1%
in 2020
China rank
105th
Uzbekistan rank
102nd
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans over time
- China
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 2.1% against 1.8% in China, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was China ahead.
China ranks 105th and Uzbekistan ranks 102nd of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.3% | 2.5% | 1.8% | China |
| 2010s | 1.4% | 1.6% | 0.2% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.2% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, China or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 2.1% against 1.8% in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between China and Uzbekistan?
- 0.3%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do China and Uzbekistan rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- China ranks 105th and Uzbekistan ranks 102nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.