Ethiopia vs Nepal: Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans
Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans over time
- Ethiopia
- Nepal
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 5.4% against 5.2% in Nepal, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 43rd of 151 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.2% | 1.6% | 1.6% | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 4.4% | 1.4% | 3.0% | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans, Ethiopia or Nepal?
- Ethiopia, at 5.4% against 5.2% in Nepal as of 2021.
- What is the difference in bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans between Ethiopia and Nepal?
- 0.2%, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Nepal?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Ethiopia and Nepal rank globally for bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans?
- Ethiopia ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 43rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The indicator measures the proportion of a deposit taker’s loan portfolio that is impaired or at risk of default. It is calculated as the ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to total gross loans, where NPLs are defined as loans that are past due by 90 days or more or are otherwise considered unlikely to be repaid in full without the realization of collateral. Both non-performing loans and total gross loans should be reported at their gross book value, without deducting for loan-loss provisions or collateral. This indicator provides a key measure of asset quality and potential credit risk in the banking system.