Eswatini vs Zambia: Bank overhead costs to total assets
Eswatini
6.4%
in 2019
Zambia
6.0%
in 2021
Eswatini rank
5th
Zambia rank
8th
Bank overhead costs to total assets over time
- Eswatini
- Zambia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 6.4% against 6.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zambia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 8th of 168 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.0% | 9.5% | 2.5% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 6.1% | 7.2% | 1.1% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank overhead costs to total assets, Eswatini or Zambia?
- Eswatini, at 6.4% against 6.0% in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in bank overhead costs to total assets between Eswatini and Zambia?
- 0.4%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zambia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Zambia rank globally for bank overhead costs to total assets?
- Eswatini ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 8th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Bankscope, Bureau van Dijk (BvD), published as Bank overhead costs to total assets (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw data are from Bankscope. Data2090[t] / ((data2025[t] + data2025[t-1])/2). Numerator and denominator are first aggregated on the country level before division. Note that banks used in the calculation might differ between indicators. Calculated from underlying bank-by-bank unconsolidated data from Bankscope.