Armenia vs New Zealand: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Armenia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 44.9% against 43.6% in New Zealand, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 110th and New Zealand ranks 112th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.8% | 30.1% | 12.7% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 25.3% | 37.3% | 12.0% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Armenia or New Zealand?
- Armenia, at 44.9% against 43.6% in New Zealand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Armenia and New Zealand?
- 1.3%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and New Zealand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2015.
- How do Armenia and New Zealand rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Armenia ranks 110th and New Zealand ranks 112th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.