Armenia vs Nigeria: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Armenia
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 45.9% against 44.9% in Armenia, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 110th and Nigeria ranks 107th of 140 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.3% | 63.4% | 8.0% | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 26.5% | 64.8% | 38.2% | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Armenia or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 45.9% against 44.9% in Armenia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Armenia and Nigeria?
- 1.0%, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Nigeria?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Armenia and Nigeria rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Armenia ranks 110th and Nigeria ranks 107th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.