Austria vs Kenya: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Austria
- Kenya
How they compare
Austria currently reports 72.6% against 71.4% in Kenya, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 47th and Kenya ranks 50th of 140 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.6% | 52.5% | 19.1% | Austria |
| 2010s | 65.4% | 44.0% | 21.4% | Austria |
| 2020s | 72.6% | 71.4% | 1.2% | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Austria or Kenya?
- Austria, at 72.6% against 71.4% in Kenya as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Austria and Kenya?
- 1.2%, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Kenya?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Austria and Kenya rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Austria ranks 47th and Kenya ranks 50th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.