Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Belarus
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 34.3% against 33.5% in Belarus, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Belarus ranks 128th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th of 140 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Belarus or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 34.3% against 33.5% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.8%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Belarus ranks 128th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.