Provisions to nonperforming loans (%) in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Provisions to nonperforming loans (%) was 34.3% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Equatorial Guinea, 2010–2019
Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for provisions to nonperforming loans in Equatorial Guinea is 34.3%, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of down 3.2% on the previous year and down 69.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 142.9% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 34.3%, in 2019.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th of 140 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%) in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 112.5% | — |
| 2011 | 124.8% | +11.0% |
| 2012 | 142.9% | +14.5% |
| 2013 | 44.3% | -69.0% |
| 2014 | 47.8% | +7.9% |
| 2015 | 54.1% | +13.1% |
| 2016 | 39.6% | -26.8% |
| 2017 | 40.8% | +2.9% |
| 2018 | 35.4% | -13.1% |
| 2019 | 34.3% | -3.2% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's 34.3% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 67.1%, 51% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's 34.3% is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 60.0%, 57% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
More financial sector data for Equatorial Guinea
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, US dollar, per capita 3.49 units per person (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve position in the IMF, SDR, per capita 2.55 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, US dollar, per capita 3.49 units per person (2025)
- Reserve tranche position, SDR, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Equatorial Guinea?
- Provisions to nonperforming loans in Equatorial Guinea was 34.3% in 2019, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
- What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 142.9% in 2012.
- What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 34.3% in 2019.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th out of 140 countries with data for 2019.
- Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 69.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.