Belgium vs Finland: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Belgium
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 42.4% against 41.1% in Belgium, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Finland ahead.
Belgium ranks 117th and Finland ranks 114th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.0% | 74.0% | 20.0% | Finland |
| 2010s | 42.7% | 35.9% | 6.8% | Belgium |
| 2020s | 41.1% | 42.4% | 1.3% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Belgium or Finland?
- Finland, at 42.4% against 41.1% in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Belgium and Finland?
- 1.3%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Finland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Finland rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Belgium ranks 117th and Finland ranks 114th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.