Belgium vs Latvia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 41.1% against 40.3% in Latvia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Latvia ahead.
Belgium ranks 117th and Latvia ranks 119th of 140 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 59.5% | 78.7% | 19.2% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 52.0% | 82.7% | 30.6% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 44.4% | 58.0% | 13.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 41.1% | 40.3% | 0.8% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Belgium or Latvia?
- Belgium, at 41.1% against 40.3% in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Belgium and Latvia?
- 0.8%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Belgium ranks 117th and Latvia ranks 119th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.