Provisions to nonperforming loans in Latvia

Latvia: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 40.3% in 2020. β–Ό Falling

Latest (2020)
40.3%
Change on year
down 9.1%
World rank
119th
of 140 countries
All-time high
129.8%
in 2007
All-time low
32.8%
in 2009
Years of data
23
1998–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Latvia, 1998–2020

4060801001201998200920201998: 78 %1999: 79.3 %2000: 74.1 %2001: 61.7 %2002: 78.3 %2003: 89.4 %2004: 99.1 %2005: 98.8 %2006: 116.6 %2007: 129.8 %2008: 46.2 %2009: 32.8 %2010: 40.5 %2011: 66.1 %2012: 71.7 %2013: 73.6 %2014: 77.2 %2015: 77.8 %2016: 45.4 %2017: 43.3 %2018: 39.7 %2019: 44.4 %2020: 40.3 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2020, provisions to nonperforming loans in Latvia stood at 40.3%.

The figure is down 9.1% on the previous year and down 0.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Latvia peaked at 129.8% in 2007 and was at its lowest, 32.8%, in 2009.

That places Latvia 119th out of 140 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 78.7% 78.0% 79.3% 2
2000s 82.7% 32.8% 129.8% 10
2010s 58.0% 39.7% 77.8% 10
2020s 40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 1

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 116 Namibia 41.2% compare
  2. 117 Belgium 41.1% compare
  3. 118 Switzerland 40.3% compare
  4. 120 Singapore 38.9% compare
  5. 121 Malaysia 38.7% compare
  6. 122 Seychelles 38.3% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places β†’

More financial sector data for Latvia

All data for Latvia β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Latvia?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Latvia was 40.3% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 129.8% in 2007.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 32.8% in 2009.
How does Latvia rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Latvia ranks 119th out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/latvia/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Latvia</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.