Latvia vs Malaysia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Latvia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 40.3% against 38.7% in Malaysia, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 119th and Malaysia ranks 121st of 140 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 79.3% | 39.0% | 40.3% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 82.7% | 44.0% | 38.7% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 58.0% | 31.6% | 26.4% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 40.3% | 38.7% | 1.6% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Latvia or Malaysia?
- Latvia, at 40.3% against 38.7% in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Latvia and Malaysia?
- 1.6%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malaysia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2020.
- How do Latvia and Malaysia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Latvia ranks 119th and Malaysia ranks 121st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.