Bolivia vs Brazil: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Bolivia
- Brazil
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 243.3% against 239.1% in Brazil, a difference of 4.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Brazil ahead.
Bolivia ranks 2nd and Brazil ranks 3rd of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.9% | 118.0% | 61.1% | Brazil |
| 2000s | 99.1% | 162.6% | 63.4% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 249.9% | 156.2% | 93.7% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Bolivia or Brazil?
- Bolivia, at 243.3% against 239.1% in Brazil as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Bolivia and Brazil?
- 4.2%, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Brazil?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2015.
- How do Bolivia and Brazil rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Bolivia ranks 2nd and Brazil ranks 3rd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.