Provisions to nonperforming loans in Brazil

Brazil: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 239.1% in 2020. β–² Rising

Latest (2020)
239.1%
Change on year
up 33.7%
World rank
3rd
of 140 countries
All-time high
239.1%
in 2020
All-time low
81.4%
in 2000
Years of data
23
1998–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Brazil, 1998–2020

1001502002501998200920201998: 110.9 %1999: 125.1 %2000: 81.4 %2001: 126.6 %2002: 155.9 %2003: 171.8 %2004: 214.5 %2005: 179.7 %2006: 179.9 %2007: 181.8 %2008: 182.5 %2009: 151.6 %2010: 164.9 %2011: 151.8 %2012: 149.1 %2013: 161.1 %2014: 155.8 %2015: 154.4 %2016: 152.2 %2017: 163.1 %2018: 180.3 %2019: 178.8 %2020: 239.1 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

Brazil recorded 239.1% for provisions to nonperforming loans in 2020. That is the highest value across all 23 years on record.

That represents a change of up 33.7% on the previous year and up 45.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Brazil peaked at 239.1% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 81.4%, in 2000.

Brazil ranks 3rd of 140 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 23 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 118.0% 110.9% 125.1% 2
2000s 162.6% 81.4% 214.5% 10
2010s 161.1% 149.1% 180.3% 10
2020s 239.1% 239.1% 239.1% 1

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 1 Venezuela 604.1% compare
  2. 2 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 243.3% compare
  3. 4 El Salvador 205.2% compare
  4. 5 China 184.5% compare
  5. 6 Dominican Republic 174.2% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places β†’

More financial sector data for Brazil

All data for Brazil β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Brazil?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Brazil was 239.1% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 239.1% in 2020.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was 81.4% in 2000.
How does Brazil rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Brazil ranks 3rd out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 45.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/brazil/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Brazil</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.