Brazil vs Dominican Republic: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Brazil
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 239.1% against 174.2% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 64.9%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.4 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Brazil ranks 3rd and Dominican Republic ranks 6th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Dominican Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 118.0% | 119.2% | 1.2% | Dominican Republic |
| 2000s | 162.6% | 116.1% | 46.5% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 161.1% | 153.8% | 7.4% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Brazil or Dominican Republic?
- Brazil, at 239.1% against 174.2% in Dominican Republic as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 64.9%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Dominican Republic rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Brazil ranks 3rd and Dominican Republic ranks 6th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.