Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guatemala: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 79.1% against 78.4% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guatemala ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 40th and Guatemala ranks 38th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 68.9% | 68.3% | 0.6% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 78.4% | 79.1% | 0.6% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 79.1% against 78.4% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala?
- 0.7%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guatemala rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 40th and Guatemala ranks 38th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.