Provisions to nonperforming loans in Guatemala

Guatemala: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 79.1% in 2020. β–² Rising

Latest (2020)
79.1%
Change on year
up 9.7%
World rank
38th
of 140 countries
All-time high
80.0%
in 2015
All-time low
40.0%
in 2006
Years of data
16
2005–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Guatemala, 2005–2020

0204060802005201220202005: 43.2 %2006: 40 %2007: 42.7 %2008: 73.2 %2009: 47.4 %2010: 62.9 %2011: 73.4 %2012: 73.3 %2013: 75.2 %2014: 71.2 %2015: 80 %2016: 60 %2017: 53.7 %2018: 61.5 %2019: 72.1 %2020: 79.1 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2020, provisions to nonperforming loans in Guatemala stood at 79.1%.

The figure is up 9.7% on the previous year and up 25.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Guatemala peaked at 80.0% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 40.0%, in 2006.

That places Guatemala 38th out of 140 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 16 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 49.3% 40.0% 73.2% 5
2010s 68.3% 53.7% 80.0% 10
2020s 79.1% 79.1% 79.1% 1

Countries ranked near Guatemala

  1. 35 Slovenia 81.7% compare
  2. 36 Central African Republic 81.2% compare
  3. 37 Lithuania 79.8% compare
  4. 39 Oman 78.6% compare
  5. 40 Bosnia and Herzegovina 78.4% compare
  6. 41 Russia 78.0% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places β†’

More financial sector data for Guatemala

All data for Guatemala β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Guatemala?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Guatemala was 79.1% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Guatemala?
The highest recorded value was 80.0% in 2015.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Guatemala?
The lowest recorded value was 40.0% in 2006.
How does Guatemala rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Guatemala ranks 38th out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Guatemala?
Over the last ten years it is up 25.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Guatemala data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Guatemala. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/guatemala/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Guatemala</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.