Guatemala vs Russian Federation: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Guatemala
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 79.1% against 78.0% in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Guatemala ranks 38th and Russian Federation ranks 41st of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.3% | 125.7% | 76.4% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 68.3% | 71.5% | 3.2% | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 79.1% | 78.0% | 1.0% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Guatemala or Russian Federation?
- Guatemala, at 79.1% against 78.0% in Russian Federation as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Guatemala and Russian Federation?
- 1.1%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Russian Federation?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
- How do Guatemala and Russian Federation rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Guatemala ranks 38th and Russian Federation ranks 41st of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.