Burundi vs Croatia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Burundi
82.8%
in 2018
Croatia
83.3%
in 2020
Burundi rank
34th
Croatia rank
33rd
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Burundi
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 83.3% against 82.8% in Burundi, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 34th and Croatia ranks 33rd of 140 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Burundi or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 83.3% against 82.8% in Burundi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Burundi and Croatia?
- 0.5%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Croatia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Burundi and Croatia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Burundi ranks 34th and Croatia ranks 33rd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.