Provisions to nonperforming loans in Croatia

Croatia: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 83.3% in 2020. ▼ Falling

Latest (2020)
83.3%
Change on year
up 1.8%
World rank
33rd
of 140 countries
All-time high
84.4%
in 1998
All-time low
38.8%
in 2010
Years of data
23
1998–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Croatia, 1998–2020

0204060801998200920201998: 84.4 %1999: 78.7 %2000: 79.9 %2001: 71.9 %2002: 68 %2003: 60.6 %2004: 62.3 %2005: 60 %2006: 56.8 %2007: 54.4 %2008: 48.7 %2009: 42.8 %2010: 38.8 %2011: 41.3 %2012: 42.5 %2013: 46.3 %2014: 51 %2015: 61.9 %2016: 70.1 %2017: 70.1 %2018: 70.3 %2019: 81.8 %2020: 83.3 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2020, provisions to nonperforming loans in Croatia stood at 83.3%.

That represents a change of up 1.8% on the previous year and up 114.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Croatia peaked at 84.4% in 1998 and was at its lowest, 38.8%, in 2010.

Croatia ranks 33rd of 140 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 81.6% 78.7% 84.4% 2
2000s 60.5% 42.8% 79.9% 10
2010s 57.4% 38.8% 81.8% 10
2020s 83.3% 83.3% 83.3% 1

Countries ranked near Croatia

  1. 30 Pakistan 88.3% compare
  2. 31 Ghana 84.3% compare
  3. 32 Djibouti 84.0% compare
  4. 34 Burundi 82.8% compare
  5. 35 Slovenia 81.7% compare
  6. 36 Central African Republic 81.2% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places →

More financial sector data for Croatia

All data for Croatia →

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Croatia?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Croatia was 83.3% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Croatia?
The highest recorded value was 84.4% in 1998.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Croatia?
The lowest recorded value was 38.8% in 2010.
How does Croatia rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Croatia ranks 33rd out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Croatia?
Over the last ten years it is up 114.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Croatia data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Croatia. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/croatia/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Croatia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.