Canada vs Denmark: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Canada
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 30.3% against 29.4% in Canada, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Denmark ahead.
Canada ranks 135th and Denmark ranks 133rd of 140 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.8% | 62.4% | 21.6% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 20.6% | 41.3% | 20.7% | Denmark |
| 2020s | 29.4% | 30.3% | 0.9% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Canada or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 30.3% against 29.4% in Canada as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Canada and Denmark?
- 0.9%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Denmark?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Canada and Denmark rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Canada ranks 135th and Denmark ranks 133rd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.