Congo vs Finland: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Congo
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 42.4% against 42.4% in Congo, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 115th and Finland ranks 114th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 54.9% | 35.9% | 19.0% | Congo |
| 2020s | 42.4% | 42.4% | 0.1% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Congo or Finland?
- Finland, at 42.4% against 42.4% in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Congo and Finland?
- 0.0%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Finland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Finland rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Congo ranks 115th and Finland ranks 114th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.