Guinea vs Sweden: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Guinea
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 63.0% against 62.0% in Guinea, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 67th and Sweden ranks 65th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 63.8% | 44.1% | 19.8% | Guinea |
| 2020s | 62.0% | 63.0% | 1.0% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Guinea or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 63.0% against 62.0% in Guinea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Guinea and Sweden?
- 1.0%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and Sweden rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Guinea ranks 67th and Sweden ranks 65th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.