Provisions to nonperforming loans in Sweden

Sweden: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 63.0% in 2020. β–Ό Falling

Latest (2020)
63.0%
Change on year
up 26.7%
World rank
65th
of 140 countries
All-time high
79.0%
in 2001
All-time low
36.6%
in 2017
Years of data
18
1998–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Sweden, 1998–2020

0204060801998200920201998: 42.3 %1999: 55.5 %2001: 79 %2002: 71.5 %2003: 50.3 %2004: 70.6 %2005: 73.6 %2006: 58 %2007: 60.4 %2008: 60.4 %2009: 47.1 %2014: 44.3 %2015: 43.9 %2016: 39.2 %2017: 36.6 %2018: 50.9 %2019: 49.7 %2020: 63 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

Sweden recorded 63.0% for provisions to nonperforming loans in 2020.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 26.7% on the previous year and up 33.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Sweden peaked at 79.0% in 2001 and was at its lowest, 36.6%, in 2017.

That places Sweden 65th out of 140 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 18 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 48.9% 42.3% 55.5% 2
2000s 63.4% 47.1% 79.0% 9
2010s 44.1% 36.6% 50.9% 6
2020s 63.0% 63.0% 63.0% 1

Countries ranked near Sweden

  1. 62 Uzbekistan 63.7% compare
  2. 63 Romania 63.3% compare
  3. 64 Lesotho 63.1% compare
  4. 66 Tajikistan 62.7% compare
  5. 67 Guinea 62.0% compare
  6. 68 Sri Lanka 61.3% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places β†’

More financial sector data for Sweden

All data for Sweden β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Sweden?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Sweden was 63.0% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Sweden?
The highest recorded value was 79.0% in 2001.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Sweden?
The lowest recorded value was 36.6% in 2017.
How does Sweden rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Sweden ranks 65th out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Sweden?
Over the last ten years it is up 33.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Sweden data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Sweden. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/sweden/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Sweden</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.