Sri Lanka vs Sweden: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 63.0% against 61.3% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 65th of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 60.4% | 44.1% | 16.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 61.3% | 63.0% | 1.7% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Sri Lanka or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 63.0% against 61.3% in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Sri Lanka and Sweden?
- 1.7%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sweden rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Sri Lanka ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 65th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.