Hungary vs Nepal: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Hungary
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 70.2% against 69.9% in Hungary, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 52nd of 140 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 69.9% | 67.3% | 2.6% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 69.9% | 70.2% | 0.3% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Hungary or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 70.2% against 69.9% in Hungary as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Hungary and Nepal?
- 0.3%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Nepal?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Hungary and Nepal rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Hungary ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 52nd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.