Provisions to nonperforming loans in Hungary

Hungary: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 69.9% in 2020. β–² Rising

Latest (2020)
69.9%
Change on year
up 5.5%
World rank
53rd
of 140 countries
All-time high
83.5%
in 2004
All-time low
32.0%
in 2009
Years of data
22
1998–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Hungary, 1998–2020

0204060801998200920201998: 45.2 %1999: 51.4 %2000: 57 %2001: 57.9 %2002: 50.8 %2003: 47.3 %2004: 83.5 %2005: 65.1 %2006: 57.1 %2008: 43.6 %2009: 32 %2010: 39.1 %2011: 45.8 %2012: 48.6 %2013: 51.7 %2014: 59.4 %2015: 69.3 %2016: 72.7 %2017: 71.8 %2018: 68.9 %2019: 66.3 %2020: 69.9 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for provisions to nonperforming loans in Hungary is 69.9%, measured in 2020.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.5% on the previous year and up 78.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Hungary peaked at 83.5% in 2004 and was at its lowest, 32.0%, in 2009.

That places Hungary 53rd out of 140 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 22 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 48.3% 45.2% 51.4% 2
2000s 54.9% 32.0% 83.5% 9
2010s 59.4% 39.1% 72.7% 10
2020s 69.9% 69.9% 69.9% 1

Countries ranked near Hungary

  1. 50 Kenya 71.4% compare
  2. 51 Bhutan 70.4% compare
  3. 52 Nepal 70.2% compare
  4. 54 Indonesia 68.3% compare
  5. 55 Chad 66.4% compare
  6. 56 Philippines 65.9% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places β†’

More financial sector data for Hungary

All data for Hungary β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Hungary?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Hungary was 69.9% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Hungary?
The highest recorded value was 83.5% in 2004.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Hungary?
The lowest recorded value was 32.0% in 2009.
How does Hungary rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Hungary ranks 53rd out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Hungary?
Over the last ten years it is up 78.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Hungary data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Hungary. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/hungary/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Hungary</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.