Iceland vs United Arab Emirates: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Iceland
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 58.7% against 58.3% in Iceland, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Iceland ranks 75th and United Arab Emirates ranks 73rd of 140 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.9% | 89.2% | 13.3% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 50.2% | 71.1% | 20.9% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 58.3% | 58.7% | 0.4% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Iceland or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 58.7% against 58.3% in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Iceland and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.4%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and United Arab Emirates?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and United Arab Emirates rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Iceland ranks 75th and United Arab Emirates ranks 73rd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.