Provisions to nonperforming loans in Iceland

Iceland: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 58.3% in 2020. β–Ό Falling

Latest (2020)
58.3%
Change on year
up 44.0%
World rank
75th
of 140 countries
All-time high
112.9%
in 2005
All-time low
40.5%
in 2019
Years of data
15
1998–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Iceland, 1998–2020

02550751001251998200920201998: 51.9 %1999: 50.5 %2000: 42.5 %2001: 79.6 %2002: 66.8 %2003: 77.5 %2004: 80.9 %2005: 112.9 %2009: 70.9 %2015: 57.3 %2016: 57.2 %2017: 52.9 %2018: 43.2 %2019: 40.5 %2020: 58.3 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for provisions to nonperforming loans in Iceland is 58.3%, measured in 2020.

That represents a change of up 44.0% on the previous year and down 17.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Iceland peaked at 112.9% in 2005 and was at its lowest, 40.5%, in 2019.

Iceland ranks 75th of 140 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 51.2% 50.5% 51.9% 2
2000s 75.9% 42.5% 112.9% 7
2010s 50.2% 40.5% 57.3% 5
2020s 58.3% 58.3% 58.3% 1

Countries ranked near Iceland

  1. 72 Madagascar 59.4% compare
  2. 73 United Arab Emirates 58.7% compare
  3. 74 Hong Kong (China) 58.3% compare
  4. 76 India 58.3% compare
  5. 77 Senegal 57.9% compare
  6. 78 United States of America 57.7% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places β†’

More financial sector data for Iceland

All data for Iceland β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Iceland?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Iceland was 58.3% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Iceland?
The highest recorded value was 112.9% in 2005.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Iceland?
The lowest recorded value was 40.5% in 2019.
How does Iceland rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Iceland ranks 75th out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Iceland?
Over the last ten years it is down 17.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Iceland data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Iceland. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/iceland/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Iceland</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.