Iceland vs India: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Iceland
- India
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 58.3% against 58.3% in India, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 75th and India ranks 76th of 140 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.6% | 54.0% | 31.5% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 50.2% | 47.9% | 2.3% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 58.3% | 58.3% | 0.0% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Iceland or India?
- Iceland, at 58.3% against 58.3% in India as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Iceland and India?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and India?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and India rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Iceland ranks 75th and India ranks 76th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.