Kazakhstan vs Zambia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Kazakhstan
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 75.9% against 75.6% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 42nd of 140 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 67.3% | 77.6% | 10.3% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 75.6% | 75.9% | 0.3% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Kazakhstan or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 75.9% against 75.6% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Kazakhstan and Zambia?
- 0.3%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Zambia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Zambia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Kazakhstan ranks 43rd and Zambia ranks 42nd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.