Kenya vs Poland: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Kenya
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 71.5% against 71.4% in Kenya, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 50th and Poland ranks 49th of 140 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.5% | 61.6% | 11.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 44.0% | 69.9% | 25.9% | Poland |
| 2020s | 71.4% | 71.5% | 0.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Kenya or Poland?
- Poland, at 71.5% against 71.4% in Kenya as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Kenya and Poland?
- 0.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Poland?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Kenya and Poland rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Kenya ranks 50th and Poland ranks 49th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.