Oman vs Zambia: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Oman
78.6%
in 2015
Zambia
75.9%
in 2020
Oman rank
39th
Zambia rank
42nd
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Oman
- Zambia
How they compare
Oman currently reports 78.6% against 75.9% in Zambia, a difference of 2.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zambia ahead.
Oman ranks 39th and Zambia ranks 42nd of 140 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Oman or Zambia?
- Oman, at 78.6% against 75.9% in Zambia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Oman and Zambia?
- 2.7%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Zambia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2015.
- How do Oman and Zambia rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Oman ranks 39th and Zambia ranks 42nd of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.