Pakistan vs Ukraine: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Pakistan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 89.3% against 88.3% in Pakistan, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 30th and Ukraine ranks 29th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.0% | 31.0% | 38.0% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 78.6% | 72.0% | 6.6% | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 88.3% | 89.3% | 0.9% | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Pakistan or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 89.3% against 88.3% in Pakistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Pakistan and Ukraine?
- 1.0%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Ukraine?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Pakistan and Ukraine rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Pakistan ranks 30th and Ukraine ranks 29th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.