Singapore vs Switzerland: Provisions to nonperforming loans
Provisions to nonperforming loans over time
- Singapore
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 40.3% against 38.9% in Singapore, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Switzerland ahead.
Singapore ranks 120th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 140 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.3% | 100.6% | 50.3% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 36.1% | 42.3% | 6.2% | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher provisions to nonperforming loans, Singapore or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 40.3% against 38.9% in Singapore as of 2020.
- What is the difference in provisions to nonperforming loans between Singapore and Switzerland?
- 1.4%, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Switzerland?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Singapore and Switzerland rank globally for provisions to nonperforming loans?
- Singapore ranks 120th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.