Egypt vs Republic of Moldova: Risk premium on lending
Risk premium on lending over time
- Egypt
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports -0.1% against -3.4% in Egypt, a difference of 3.3%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Egypt ranks 83rd and Republic of Moldova ranks 81st of 86 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.3% | 2.6% | 1.8% | Egypt |
| 2000s | 4.1% | 9.5% | 5.4% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | -0.3% | 3.2% | 3.5% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | -3.6% | 1.1% | 4.8% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk premium on lending, Egypt or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at -0.1% against -3.4% in Egypt as of 2025.
- What is the difference in risk premium on lending between Egypt and Republic of Moldova?
- 3.3%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Republic of Moldova?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Republic of Moldova rank globally for risk premium on lending?
- Egypt ranks 83rd and Republic of Moldova ranks 81st of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Risk premium on lending (lending rate minus treasury bill rate, %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Risk premium on lending is the interest rate charged by banks on loans to private sector customers minus the "risk free" treasury bill interest rate at which short-term government securities are issued or traded in the market. In some countries this spread may be negative, indicating that the market considers its best corporate clients to be lower risk than the government. The terms and conditions attached to lending rates differ by country, however, limiting their comparability.