Bank capital to total assets in Belarus
Belarus: Bank capital to total assets was 14.2% in 2020. ▼ Falling
Bank capital to total assets in Belarus, 2001–2020
Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 14.2% for bank capital to total assets in 2020.
The figure is down 4.4% on the previous year and up 4.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bank capital to total assets in Belarus peaked at 19.8% in 2005 and was at its lowest, 12.8%, in 2015.
That places Belarus 22nd out of 139 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.
Bank capital to total assets in Belarus, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 15.1% | — |
| 2002 | 18.7% | +23.8% |
| 2004 | 19.0% | +1.6% |
| 2005 | 19.8% | +4.2% |
| 2006 | 17.9% | -9.6% |
| 2007 | 16.0% | -10.6% |
| 2008 | 18.6% | +16.3% |
| 2009 | 16.7% | -10.2% |
| 2010 | 13.6% | -18.3% |
| 2011 | 14.0% | +2.5% |
| 2012 | 14.4% | +2.7% |
| 2013 | 14.0% | -2.7% |
| 2014 | 13.3% | -4.6% |
| 2015 | 12.8% | -3.8% |
| 2016 | 13.5% | +4.9% |
| 2017 | 14.6% | +8.3% |
| 2018 | 14.6% | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 14.8% | +1.5% |
| 2020 | 14.2% | -4.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.7% | 15.1% | 19.8% | 8 |
| 2010s | 14.0% | 12.8% | 14.8% | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.2% | 14.2% | 14.2% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More financial sector data for Belarus
- Net domestic credit (current LCU), per capita 6,475 current LCU per person (2021)
- Net domestic credit (current LCU), per unit of GDP 0.8645 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Net domestic credit (current LCU), annual growth rate 7.44 % change on previous year (2021)
- Gold reserves at 35 SDRs per ounce 60.68 million SDR (2025)
- Gold reserves at market value 5.53 billion SDR (2025)
- Reserves excluding gold, foreign exchange 4.05 billion SDR (2025)
- Reserves excluding gold 5.07 billion SDR (2025)
- Total reserves (gold at market value) 10.60 billion SDR (2025)
- Total reserves (gold at national valuation) 10.53 billion SDR (2025)
- Total reserves (gold at national valuation) (SDR), per capita 1,159 SDR per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bank capital to total assets in Belarus?
- Bank capital to total assets in Belarus was 14.2% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
- What is the highest bank capital to total assets recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 19.8% in 2005.
- What is the lowest bank capital to total assets recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.8% in 2015.
- How does Belarus rank for bank capital to total assets?
- Belarus ranks 22nd out of 139 countries with data for 2020.
- Is bank capital to total assets rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Bank capital to total assets (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Ratio of bank capital and reserves to total assets. Capital and reserves include funds contributed by owners, retained earnings, general and special reserves, provisions, and valuation adjustments. Capital includes tier 1 capital (paid-up shares and common stock), which is a common feature in all countries' banking systems, and total regulatory capital, which includes several specified types of subordinated debt instruments that need not be repaid if the funds are required to maintain minimum capital levels (these comprise tier 2 and tier 3 capital). Total assets include all nonfinancial and financial assets. Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.