United Kingdom vs United States: Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%)
United Kingdom
1.2%
in 2020
United States
1.1%
in 2020
United Kingdom rank
123rd
United States rank
126th
Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%) over time
- United Kingdom
- United States
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 1.2% against 1.1% in United States, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times United States's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was United Kingdom ahead.
United Kingdom ranks 123rd and United States ranks 126th of 141 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, United Kingdom averaged higher in 3 and United States in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Kingdom | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.1% | 1.0% | 2.1% | United Kingdom |
| 2000s | 2.0% | 1.7% | 0.3% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.0% | United States |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 1.1% | 0.2% | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher bank non-performing loans to gross loans, United Kingdom or United States?
- United Kingdom, at 1.2% against 1.1% in United States as of 2020.
- What is the difference in bank non-performing loans to gross loans between United Kingdom and United States?
- 0.1%, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and United States?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do United Kingdom and United States rank globally for bank non-performing loans to gross loans?
- United Kingdom ranks 123rd and United States ranks 126th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Bank non-performing loans to gross loans (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.