Provisions to nonperforming loans in Estonia

Estonia: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 32.6% in 2020. β—† Volatile

Latest (2020)
32.6%
Change on year
down 19.2%
World rank
130th
of 140 countries
All-time high
276.9%
in 2004
All-time low
14.4%
in 2007
Years of data
20
2001–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Estonia, 2001–2020

01002003002001201020202001: 110.2 %2002: 130.6 %2003: 214.5 %2004: 276.9 %2005: 23.9 %2006: 18.6 %2007: 14.4 %2008: 25.4 %2009: 41.3 %2010: 44.9 %2011: 43.7 %2012: 35 %2013: 28.9 %2014: 25.2 %2015: 29.2 %2016: 28.2 %2017: 21.3 %2018: 35.4 %2019: 40.3 %2020: 32.6 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

Estonia recorded 32.6% for provisions to nonperforming loans in 2020.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 19.2% on the previous year and down 27.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Estonia peaked at 276.9% in 2004 and was at its lowest, 14.4%, in 2007.

That places Estonia 130th out of 140 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 95.1% 14.4% 276.9% 9
2010s 33.2% 21.3% 44.9% 10
2020s 32.6% 32.6% 32.6% 1

Countries ranked near Estonia

  1. 127 United Kingdom 33.9% compare
  2. 128 Belarus 33.5% compare
  3. 129 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 32.9% compare
  4. 131 Fiji 32.4% compare
  5. 132 Tonga 30.4% compare
  6. 133 Denmark 30.3% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places β†’

More financial sector data for Estonia

All data for Estonia β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Estonia?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Estonia was 32.6% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Estonia?
The highest recorded value was 276.9% in 2004.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Estonia?
The lowest recorded value was 14.4% in 2007.
How does Estonia rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Estonia ranks 130th out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Estonia?
Over the last ten years it is down 27.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Estonia data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Estonia. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/estonia/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Estonia</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.