Provisions to nonperforming loans in Uganda

Uganda: Provisions to nonperforming loans was 45.0% in 2020. β–Ό Falling

Latest (2020)
45.0%
Change on year
up 2.9%
World rank
109th
of 140 countries
All-time high
97.8%
in 2004
All-time low
41.4%
in 2006
Years of data
23
1998–2020

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Uganda, 1998–2020

0204060801001998200920201998: 54.2 %1999: 51.9 %2000: 61.7 %2001: 70 %2002: 81.5 %2003: 76.5 %2004: 97.8 %2005: 66.8 %2006: 41.4 %2007: 52.5 %2008: 78 %2009: 57.2 %2010: 65 %2011: 50.9 %2012: 45.9 %2013: 64.8 %2014: 48.9 %2015: 41.6 %2016: 60.4 %2017: 54.5 %2018: 54.1 %2019: 43.7 %2020: 45 %

Source: Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Measured in %.

Analysis

Uganda recorded 45.0% for provisions to nonperforming loans in 2020.

The figure is up 2.9% on the previous year and down 30.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, provisions to nonperforming loans in Uganda peaked at 97.8% in 2004 and was at its lowest, 41.4%, in 2006.

Uganda ranks 109th of 140 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 23 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 53.0% 51.9% 54.2% 2
2000s 68.3% 41.4% 97.8% 10
2010s 53.0% 41.6% 65.0% 10
2020s 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 1

Countries ranked near Uganda

  1. 106 Bulgaria 46.0% compare
  2. 107 Nigeria 45.9% compare
  3. 108 Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China 45.1% compare
  4. 110 Armenia, Republic of 44.9% compare
  5. 111 Cyprus 44.4% compare
  6. 112 New Zealand 43.6% compare

See the full ranking of 140 places β†’

More financial sector data for Uganda

All data for Uganda β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is provisions to nonperforming loans in Uganda?
Provisions to nonperforming loans in Uganda was 45.0% in 2020, according to Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF).
What is the highest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Uganda?
The highest recorded value was 97.8% in 2004.
What is the lowest provisions to nonperforming loans recorded in Uganda?
The lowest recorded value was 41.4% in 2006.
How does Uganda rank for provisions to nonperforming loans?
Uganda ranks 109th out of 140 countries with data for 2020.
Is provisions to nonperforming loans rising or falling in Uganda?
Over the last ten years it is down 30.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Uganda data come from?
The figures come from Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as part of Provisions to nonperforming loans (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Provisions to nonperforming loans in Uganda. Statizoid, drawing on Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/provisions-to-nonperforming-loans-percent/uganda/">Provisions to nonperforming loans in Uganda</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Provisions to nonperforming loans (%)
Unit
%
Source
Financial Soundness Indicators Database (fsi.imf.org), International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
140 places, 2,230 data points, 1998–2020
Last refreshed

Provisions to nonperforming loans. Nonperforming Loans are loans for which the contractual payments are delinquent, usually defined as and NPL ratio being overdue for more than a certain number of days (e.g., usually more than 90 days). Reported by IMF staff. Note that due to differences in national accounting, taxation, and supervisory regimes, these data are not strictly comparable across countries.